Many people know Judge Judy as someone who adheres strictly to logical and objective thinking, scrutinizing the claims made by both the plaintiff and the defendant in order to get at the truth and do what is right.
Keeping this information in mind, it is possible that many people would find it surprising that a lady with such a reputation would base her conclusion on the decisions made by a dog.
The case, which was about who should have custody of a puppy fittingly called Baby Boy, seemed to be a straightforward one at first glance. The plaintiff claimed that the dog belonged to him, while the defendant stated that she had bought the dog off the street for a paltry fifty dollars.
Judge Judy seemed to have some reservations about the proof that the defendant presented, which consisted of a pile of photographs and documents, and appeared to be on the fence about the truth about the identity of Baby Boy’s owner.
She requested the defendant to bring the dog into the courtroom and place it on the floor so it was free to wander and finally express its love and devotion for the rightful owner. The notorious judge relied on the faithfulness of the man’s closest friend to help her make the decision, as she asked the defendant to bring the dog into the courtroom and set it on the floor.
The dog raced in the direction of the claimant without pausing for a moment to think. As the facts of the situation became more apparent to the judge, he subsequently gave the plaintiff permission to take the dog home with him.